<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1971 Jaguar XKE Coupe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ferraricraft.com/2008/07/1971-jaguar-xke-coupe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ferraricraft.com/2008/07/1971-jaguar-xke-coupe/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:18:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chuck goolsbee</title>
		<link>http://www.ferraricraft.com/2008/07/1971-jaguar-xke-coupe/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck goolsbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ferraricraft.com/2008/07/30/1971-jaguar-xke-coupe/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>The last Series 2 E-types had a chrome trim around the grille (sort of a pseudo Series 3 look) and a goofy &quot;leaper&quot; badge on their bonnets low down along the sides. You can &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.xkedata.com/cars/detail/?car=2R28704&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;see an example of one here&lt;/a&gt;. Have these been removed from this car to clean up the appearance? I say this only because there are two sorts of E-type owners: &quot;Drivers&quot; and &quot;Show-ers&quot;. A Driver won&#039;t care about how many of what were made in what year, they only care that it is an E-type and it works. The &quot;Show&quot; guy is going to want everything as original as possible and will need all the important details particular to this iteration to be there and be correct. I imagine that every make and model has this dichotomy.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In this case though, rarity is not going to add up to (extra) value. It can be made a great driver, but will never be a truly desirable or valuable show car. The last of the E-type line (the &quot;50 black&quot; V-12s might have a bit of value, but the tail end of the S2 run has no cachet.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you have all the numbers off the data plate, you should enter it on that registry linked above (if it isn&#039;t already there.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;--chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last Series 2 E-types had a chrome trim around the grille (sort of a pseudo Series 3 look) and a goofy &#8220;leaper&#8221; badge on their bonnets low down along the sides. You can <a HREF="http://www.xkedata.com/cars/detail/?car=2R28704" REL="nofollow">see an example of one here</a>. Have these been removed from this car to clean up the appearance? I say this only because there are two sorts of E-type owners: &#8220;Drivers&#8221; and &#8220;Show-ers&#8221;. A Driver won&#8217;t care about how many of what were made in what year, they only care that it is an E-type and it works. The &#8220;Show&#8221; guy is going to want everything as original as possible and will need all the important details particular to this iteration to be there and be correct. I imagine that every make and model has this dichotomy.</p>
<p>In this case though, rarity is not going to add up to (extra) value. It can be made a great driver, but will never be a truly desirable or valuable show car. The last of the E-type line (the &#8220;50 black&#8221; V-12s might have a bit of value, but the tail end of the S2 run has no cachet.</p>
<p>If you have all the numbers off the data plate, you should enter it on that registry linked above (if it isn&#8217;t already there.)</p>
<p>&#8211;chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
